MODERN EUROPEAN AND CHINESE CONTRACT LAW A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PARTY AUTONOMY【2025|PDF下载-Epub版本|mobi电子书|kindle百度云盘下载】

MODERN EUROPEAN AND CHINESE CONTRACT LAW A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PARTY AUTONOMYPDF格式电子书版下载

注意：本站所有压缩包均有解压码： 点击下载压缩包解压工具

Introduction1

1.1. The Horizontal Convergence Approach5

1.2. Vertical Convergence Approach6

Chapter 1 A Brief History of Private Law in China and Europe9

1.1. A Short History of Civil Law Development in China9

1.1.1. Confucianism and the History of Chinese Civil Law before the Twentieth Century10

1.1.2. The First Draft Civil Code13

1.1.3. The First Implemented Civil Code15

1.1.4. The Development of the Civil Law in the Maoist Period16

1.1.5. The Development of Contract Law in the 1980s16

1.1.6. The New Uniform Contract Law18

1.1.7. Chinese Property Law20

1.1.8. Chinese Tort Law21

1.1.9. Chinese Civil Code21

1.1.10. Conclusion22

1.2. The Convergence of European Contract Law23

1.2.1. Academic Reasons30

1.2.2. Political Reasons31

1.2.3. Legal Reasons32

1.2.4. Economic Reasons33

1.2.5. Conclusion34

1.3. Comparative Conclusion34

Chapter 2 Fundamental Principles of Modern Contract Laws37

2.1. Fundamental Principles of Chinese Contract Law37

2.1.1. Voluntariness39

2.1.2. Socioeconomic Valuation42

2.1.2.1. Traditional Social Ethics43

2.1.2.1.1. Fairness43

2.1.2.1.2. Good Faith44

2.1.2.1.3. Public Interest47

2.1.2.2. Current Economic Situation50

2.1.2.2.1. Equality50

2.1.2.2.2. Promotion Business Transactions51

2.2. Fundamental Principles of European Contract Law53

2.2.1. Freedom of Contract54

2.2.2. Good Faith61

2.2.3. Fair Dealing64

2.3. Comparative Conclusion66

Chapter 3 Comparison of Several Doctrines69

3.1. Interpretation69

3.1.1. European Contract Law70

3.1.1.1. Common Intention72

3.1.1.2. Relevant Matters74

3.1.1.3. Contra proferentem Rule75

3.1.1.4. Legal-Effect Preference to the Individually Negotiated Terms76

3.1.1.5. Reference to Contract as a Whole77

3.1.1.6. Terms to Be Given Effect77

3.1.1.7. Linguistic Discrepancies78

3.1.2. Chinese Contract Law78

3.1.2.1. True Meaning79

3.1.2.2. Purpose of Contract81

3.1.2.3. Contra proferentem Rule82

3.1.3. Comparison82

3.1.3.1. Common Intention versus True Meaning82

3.1.3.2. Relevant Circumstances83

3.1.3.3. Contra proferentem Rule83

3.1.3.4. Linguistic Discrepancies84

3.2. Pre-contractual Liability84

3.2.1. European Contract Law85

3.2.1.1. Information Duty86

3.2.1.2. Negotiation in Accordance with Good Faith and Fair Dealing87

3.2.1.3. Duty of Confidentiality89

3.2.2. Chinese Contract Law89

3.2.2.1. Negotiating in Bad Faith under the Pretext of Concluding a Contract90

3.2.2.2. Deliberately Concealing Important Facts Relating to the Conclusion of the Contract or Deliberately Providing False Information90

3.2.2.3. Disclosing or Inappropriately Exploiting Business Secret91

3.2.2.4. Other Activities Violating the Principle of Good Faith91

3.2.3. Comparison92

3.3. Contract Validity93

3.3.1. Mistake94

3.3.1.1. European Contract Law95

3.3.1.1.1. Mistake Must Make the Contract Fundamentally Different95

3.3.1.1.2. Causes for Mistake95

3.3.1.1.3. Remedies and Effects96

3.3.1.1.4. Relief97

3.3.1.2. Chinese Contract Law97

3.3.1.2.1. Misunderstanding Must Be Significant98

3.3.1.2.2. Causes of Significant Misunderstanding98

3.3.1.2.3. Remedies and Effects99

3.3.1.3. Comparison100

3.3.1.3.1. Coverage100

3.3.1.3.2. Element100

3.3.1.3.3. Remedies and Effects100

3.3.1.3.4. Relief101

3.3.2. Fraud101

3.3.2.1. European Contract Law102

3.3.2.1.1. Dishonesty102

3.3.2.1.2. Reliance103

3.3.2.1.3. Remedies103

3.3.2.2. Chinese Contract Law103

3.3.2.2.1. Intent to Deceive104

3.3.2.2.2. Conduct of Deceives104

3.3.2.2.3. Reliance104

3.3.2.2.4. Mistaken Manifestation104

3.3.2.2.5. Remedies105

3.3.2.3. Comparison105

3.3.3. Threats106

3.3.3.1. European Contract Law106

3.3.3.1.1. Imminent and Serious106

3.3.3.1.2. Wrongful by Itself or Should Be Wrongly Used107

3.3.3.1.3. Lead to the Conclusion of the Contract107

3.3.3.1.4. Coerced Party Should Not Have Any Other Reasonable Alternatives107

3.3.3.2. Chinese Contract Law108

3.3.3.3. Comparison109

3.3.4. lmbalanced Bargaining109

3.3.4.1. European Contract Law110

3.3.4.2. Chinese Contract Law112

3.3.4.3. Comparison114

3.3.5. Conclusion114

3.4. Adaptation116

3.4.1. European Contract Law117

3.4.1.1. Mistake117

3.4.1.2. Excessive Benefit or Unfair Advantage118

3.4.1.3. Change of Circumstances118

3.4.2. Chinese Contract Law120

3.4.3. Comparison123

3.5. Termination124

3.5. 1. European Contract Law125

3.5.1.1. Grounds to Terminate the Contract125

3.5.1.1.1. Fundamental Non-performance125

3.5.1.1.2. Delayed Performance127

3.5.1.1.3. Anticipatory Non-performance127

3.5.1.1.4. Inadequate Assurance of Performance128

3.5.1.2. Notice129

3.5.1.3. Effects of Termination130

3.5.2. Chinese Contract Law131

3.5.2.1. Termination by Agreement132

3.5.2.2. Statutory Rights of Termination133

3.5.2.2.1. Force Majeure133

3.5.2.2.2. Anticipatory Repudiation134

3.5.2.2.3. Unreasonable Delay134

3.5.2.2.4. Frustration of Contract Purpose135

3.5.2.3. Notice135

3.5.2.4. Effect of Termination136

3.5.2.4.1. Release from Performance137

3.5.2.4.2. Restitution137

3.5.2.4.3. Damages138

3.5.3. Comparison139

3.6. Mandatory Rules139

3.6.1. European Contract Law140

3.6.1.1. Sources of Mandatory Rules141

3.6.1.1.1. Fundamental Principles141

3.6.1.1.2. Mandatory Rules142

3.6.1.2. Effects of Contracts Infringing Fundamental Principles or Mandatory Rules143

3.6.1.2.1. Purpose of the Rule144

3.6.1.2.2. Category of Persons for Whose Protection the Rule Exists144

3.6.1.2.3. Any Sanction that May Be Imposed under the Rule Infringed145

3.6.1.2.4. Seriousness of the Infringement145

3.6.1.2.5. Where the Infringement was Intentional145

3.6.1.2.6. Relationship between the Infringement and the Contract145

3.6.2. Chinese Contract Law146

3.6.2.1. Sources of Mandatory Rules146

3.6.2.1.1. Laws146

3.6.2.1.2. Administrative Regulations147

3.6.2.1.3. Authoritative Interpretation149

3.6.2.1.4. State Plan151

3.6.2.1.5. International Treaties151

3.6.2.2. Effects of Contracts Infringing Mandatory Rules151

3.6.3. Comparison152

3.7. Constitutionalization of Contract Law152

3.7.1. European Contract Law153

3.7.1.1. Fundamental Rights153

3.7.1.1.1. Interpretation of Rules158

3.7.1.1.2. Non-discrimination159

3.7.1.1.3. Validity of Contract160

3.7.1.2. Social Justice160

3.7.1.2. 1. Definition of Consumer162

3.7.1.2.2. Extension of Weak Party Protections162

3.7.2. Chinese Contract Law163

3.7.3. Comparison166

Conclusion169

Bibliography175

Index185